AI content quality control and review checklist, first version

Read Time:1 Minute, 49 Second

My gift to you! But please donate at ko-fi.com/lizziebruce if it’s helpful.* And check out my user centred design e-learning courses, which include content design.

This is version 1.0 of an AI content quality checklist, made from a content designer’s point of view. Do credit me if you re-use the image or text!

AI content quality control and review checklist

Left side: inputs

Does your prompt reflect a researched user

need for the information?

Have you provided a priority order for user needs relating to different aspects of the information? For example, opening times may be a higher info seek priority than parking.

Does your prompt provide context?
AI content quality control and review checklist
Have you provided content standards relating to accessibility, inclusivity, readability and usability, that consider a range of physical and neurological content access challenges?
Have you provided a style guide?
Have you included user language terms?
Have you included important keywords?
Have you provided names, authors and credits
for quotes, citations and imagery?

Outputs:
Is the content factually correct?
Does it make sense when you read it?
Does the content meet criteria that decide whether the user need has been met?
Does the content answer user needs in the priority order you supplied?
Does the content work for all your different audience types, applying its information in a variety of contexts?
Does the content meet accessibility standards?
For example, is link text meaningful, do images have alt text descriptions, is it in clear language, is the font legible, is there good enough colour contrast?
Is the language used inclusive for all races, genders, abilities and ages? Might any framing or examples be exclude any groups?
Is the content easily absorbable for people who are dyslexic, very anxious, distressed or distracted, and people with low literacy? For example, are sentences generally around 15 words long?
Has the style guide been followed accurately?
Have user language terms been applied accurately?
Are important keywords included in a naturally flowing, non-obvious way?
Have names, authors and credits been applied correctly to quotes, citations and imagery?
Also on the image is the Cake Design Studio logo and a post it signposting the Cake website and a tip jar donation page: ko-fi.com/lizziebruce.

Inputs

  • Does your prompt reflect a researched user need for the information?
  • Have you provided a priority order for user needs relating to different aspects of the information? For example, opening times may be a higher info seek priority than parking.
  • Does your prompt provide context?
  • Have you provided content standards relating to accessibility, inclusivity, readability and usability, that consider a range of physical and neurological content access challenges?
  • Have you provided a style guide?
  • Have you included user language terms?
  • Have you included important keywords?
  • Have you provided names, authors and credits for quotes, citations and imagery?

Outputs

  • Is the content factually correct?
  • Does it make sense when you read it?
  • Does the content meet criteria that decide whether the user need has been met?
  • Does the content answer user needs in the priority order you supplied?
  • Does the content work for all your different audience types, applying its information in a variety of contexts?
  • Does the content meet accessibility standards?
  • For example, is link text meaningful, do images have alt text descriptions, is it in clear language, is the font legible, is there good enough colour contrast?
  • Is the language used inclusive for all races, genders, abilities and ages? Might any framing or examples exclude any groups?
  • Is the content easily absorbable for people who are dyslexic, very anxious, distressed or distracted, and people with low literacy? For example, are sentences generally around 15 words long?
  • Has the style guide been followed accurately?
  • Have user language terms been applied accurately?
  • Are important keywords included in a naturally flowing, non-obvious way?
  • Have names, authors and credits been applied correctly to quotes, citations and imagery?

*Especially if you copy and paste the text description – provided for screen reader accessibility, and for people who find the image text difficult to absorb for other reasons. Thanks!

☕️

Pair writing with stakeholders, subject experts, designers and other team members

Read Time:7 Minute, 18 Second

I’ve seen pair writing done well and done badly. This article suggests some steps and advice for achieving the former.  

But first, what is pair writing? It’s the practice of writing a piece of content together with someone else. You meet up in real time, likely to be remotely at the moment, and both have the draft document open. The content designer would have created the draft document, which may at the initial stage only have section headings, based on and prioritised by user needs. 

Unless you are pair writing with a content designer, you would only discuss factual information to answer the user needs, and whether  your content development and iterative edits are factually accurate.

Pair writing with subject matter experts

Step 1: Involve subject matter experts (SME) in regular content show and tells – so that they know about and understand content design, and know the schedule of upcoming topics far in advance. 

Step 2: Meet with them at the start of writing a piece of content on a topic in their knowledge area. Tell them what the user needs are for the content. Ask about any information gaps you’ve identified in the factual source material you have access to.  

Step 3: Draft your piece of content and book in a meeting with the SME, for them to review it with you.

Step 4: At the SME review meeting, explain what the content decisions were and remind them of, or share, learnings on content design best practice.

It’s more effective to refer to external references on usability and readability than to present the best practice as your professional opinion or what the organisation style guide says, as they may well argue against internal advice! I’d recommend the Readability Guidelines wiki. Not because I worked on it for a year and a half, but because it has over 200 usability evidence sources to back up the guidance.

If you know something is best practice but haven’t got a reference to hand, let the SME know that you will do some research and follow up with them.

Case study example: I had to put job profile descriptions into plain English. SMEs argued for more nuanced terms. I explained that clear language is more user-friendly for their national audience of 17 year olds, career changers and returners to work, who may not know much about the job yet or may have a low literacy or fluency level. Also explained that although being concise is generally good for web content, a clear language definition may end up making the copy longer but that’s OK as it is better for content to be understood by all than to be brief.

Step 5: Edit the draft for any feedback you agree needs to be actioned. Your steer on what to change should be:

1) factual corrections where meaning may have been obscured in your draft
2) extra information, if it meets a user need

For this step, if you are comfortable doing the edits “live” you can edit the draft during your Step 4 discussion. If not, thank the stakeholder for their contribution and say you will be in touch with them about the next review session.

Step 6: Get another content designer or content person on your team to peer review the draft, that is read through it and give any style, readability or layout suggestions they may have. This is sometimes called a 2i, standing for having a second eye on the content. 

Amend if you agree with their suggestions or leave it to user testing to decide. A/B testing, where you user test 2 different versions of content, can often solve differences of professional opinion between designers.

Step 7: Test the content with users. This may be within a clickable prototype. Testing with 5 users is said to uncover 85% of user issues, but remember that leaves 15% undiscovered. 

Iterate the content from analysis of their feedback. When you analyse user feedback, look for themes. Usually if only 1 person has a minor problem you can discard it. However, if that is because the person has access needs that the others do not, and the problem relates to access, then you should not discard the feedback. 

Repeat as many times as necessary for a good understanding of the content, and smooth interaction with it, by a variety of users, or as far as budget allows.

Step 8: Meet the SME to run through the final draft, or email it to them. Be clear that at this stage you can only accept factual amend suggestions. If you email it, set the permission to comment only, not track changes. If they make a lot of comments, arrange another in person meeting. If you make significant changes as a result of their feedback, ask another content designer to 2i the final draft.

Step 9: Make sure that the SME understands that they are responsible for the factual accuracy and appropriacy of the content. They should get in touch if for example regulations referenced in the piece change or are removed. You would also involve them in regular 3, 6 or 12 month reviews of the content piece.

Whenever you talk to SMEs, make sure they understand and largely agree with your content design changes. Keep explaining things patiently. If they refuse to acknowledge user centred-design content principles, escalate the discussion to your content lead, head of content or UX lead. 

Pair writing with service designers 

You might have a service designer working with you on a digital product or service. You’d work closely with them throughout the build, but in terms of drafting initial content you’d meet with them at:

  • Step 2, to understand fully the intricacies of the service
  • Step 7, to iterate the content to reflect service or product changes made as a result of user testing feedback (you would also apply content design changes that you believe will fix user issues and observe any difference made at the next round of testing)
  • Possibly at Step 8, if the SME had significant changes
  • Step 9 for the “life after live” reviews, testing and iteration

Pair writing with technical architects

Technical architects might ask you to work with them to write up technical reports in language that non-technical project members can understand. You would pair write with them by getting them to explain clearly what they mean by technical jargon.

Keep asking them “What does that actually mean?” until you reach a point where a non-technical specialist can understand the content. Encourage them to explain abstract concepts to you as though they were explaining it to a friend. This can be a good way to get a simple take on it. 

Another good way to translate technical concepts into clear language is to write a phrase or definition out on a white board and analyse parts of the sentence in turn to find clearer alternative wording.

Pair writing with another content designer

As well as the at 2i stages at Step 6 and Step 8, you could share your draft with a second content designer every time you make revisions, and invite them to the SME meetings. You would also get peer content designer feedback at content crits.

Alternatively you may be working together with a second content designer to co-create a piece of content. If you’re pair writing 50/50 like that, to create the initial draft you’d both sketch out how to word and prioritise headings to answer needs, then discuss your sketches to agree on the best of both to write up into a draft document.  

You could then take it in turns to meet the SME, and agree edits together afterwards. That can help prevent it becoming or being perceived by the SME as a person-to-person opinion exchange. Or you could both meet the SME to back each other up on content best practice, but be very careful with this as it could come across as bullying them into it.

Or you may have a senior content designer working with a more junior one to mentor them and pass on skills.

Both content designers should attend, or remotely observe, all user testing on the piece of content. And you’ll still benefit from large group content crits, where content designers who are not as involved in the piece of content can give objective feedback on how understandable it is.

Resources

Weeknotes 5 April 2024, 12 April 2024

Read Time:4 Minute, 25 Second

It’s another double bill for this week’s weeknotes!

– Easter break was lovely, and I caught up in-person with an ex-graphic design colleague from waay back. He now runs the Electric Eel cocktail bar in Karlsruhe. We talked career paths and speakeasys, Basset hounds and folk documentaries. And writing. It turns out Craig was an ace at advertorial writing, but morphed into graphical design. He writes a mean weekly newsletter from the Eel, check it out.

– Wrote/designed various informational advice articles for arts copyright client. Learnt more about moral rights! Excellent factual source material for the evidenced user-needs, so mainly reshaping question and answer content into topics with front-loaded headers. I shared some clear language do-overs of incidental legalese on the Cake Content Consultancy LI page.

– It’s going to take a little longer to get the original localgov service patterns up due to various factors, mainly how incredibly good the interactive demo site was. It’ll likely be just the screenshots and descriptions.

– Upheld that you are not the user, but promptly after found that sometimes you are – in a chat with James Green about content translator options. I was flummoxed to find how disparate my need as a user (an obvious translate button please, ideally with an icon that makes sense in any language) differentiated from what I would recommend as good practice (trio writing or as a fall back a browser extension). Don’t worry, I’ve now got the Google translator extension for Chrome. But if it took me a digital professional this long… #DigitalSkillsGap

Adam Silver (loving his LinkedIn profile url), who has in the last couple of months been the closest thing I’ve ever had to a mentor, gave me some great advice again. As a result I am taking down my user-centred content design educational offering and reshaping it. Watch this space.

– Adam launched his Prototype Kit course for government designers including content designers, which by all accounts is excellent. If you’ve seen the quality of his posts or read his newsletter, you’ll already know that it would be. I’m tempted to take it myself, and have been thinking again about the logic and little grey cell challenges of working in code…

– Disappointed to hear that there was a meet-up with ‘proving value of content design’ top of agenda, loosely associated with folk who 12 years prior named and defined content design, and 5 years after they published a deeply researched article proving the value of content design, including quoted research from Gerry McGovern on how content edits can literally save lives. I co-wrote that article, I’ll add a link to my copy of on this blog, as for some reason it’s not live in its original location any more.

– All this does beg the question, perhaps there’s something wrong with the naming and defining part? Does it properly say what it does on the tin? No, it seems to me. Is ‘content design’, in fact, a jargon term? Is this making things harder for all the content folk out there, advocating, sketching and typing at the digital coalface, and in fact getting laid off it? It might be. This is why the discipline name is more than semantics. As previously mentioned, I’m #TeamInformationDesign – and yes we need t-shirts. I must re-check on tickets for the Information Design conference Caroline Jarrett mentioned to me.

– For people currently looking for a new role, please feel free to browse my Content design interview questions article, which includes an outline simple CV template. Portfolios seem to be a requirement too these days.

– T-shirts were again a theme in terms of their capability as a wearable display for quotes from developers on what they thought about content design, before they’d worked with content designers. This brilliant piece of “real talk” interdisciplinary research was curated and facilitated by Mary Sabotkoski.

– Relatedly, Torrey Podmajersky is talking about content design for developers in July, and Mary shared the excellent talk she gave on content design meets engineering in 2022. I love the content designer-developer relationship when it happens. Perhaps we do just need to proliferate content design more, rather than iterating it with new label text. I gave a shout out to excellent developers I’ve collaborated with in the past. (Side note: with designers sometimes barring us from the prototype, perhaps going direct to dev is The Way).

– Loved Megan Legawiec’s work on empty states, and Co-op’s work on communicating research findings – thanks Jane McFayden for bringing it to my attention.

– Thrilled to discover there is a band called CAKE, and they are the folk who put out ‘Going the Distance’. Shared for some Tuesday energy, after watching the Paris marathon at the weekend – inspiration from those hand tap cardboard signs that the runners did actually enjoy interacting with, despite the 26.4 mile course.

– And in wrapping up, a little bird suggested I put out a regular newsletter. Perhaps this will evolve into that… Don’t forget to check out the Cake Design Objet D’Week series too, where we probe an actual 3D object (I know!!!) to see how user-centred it is.

New book: ‘What do we do in this room?’ – optimise your living space, with simple techniques

Read Time:1 Minute, 12 Second

Optimise the space you live in. Learn user experience (UX) design techniques to apply at home, to improve the day-to-day experience of where you live.

Ask: “What do we do in this room? And is there a better way to do it?”

Book cover of 'What do we do in this room?' by Lizzie Bruce. Additional text says: 'How to make your home work brilliantly for everyday activities. A practical, customisable guide. Includes ideas for sustainability, multi-functionality and accessibility.

This interactive manual equips you to be your own interior designer. You’ll systematically research room use, prioritise, and plan the design of your room layouts around what you really need to use the space for.

It’s for anyone who wants to make efficient use of space, and could be particularly useful for people moving into their own place for the first time. For every room you’ll find:

  • universal task suggestions: over 100 in total
  • essential, and added comfort, requirements
  • space to add your own tasks and needs

Includes design advice for:

  • home offices
  • toddlers and pets
  • multifunctional solutions
  • sustainability
  • accessibility
  • task flows

Along the way you’ll gain an understanding of time and motion theory, learn to factor in task flows for optimal efficiency, and be supported to create your own floor plans and 3D models.

Lizzie combines a digital design career of over 2 decades with interior spatial design training from Chelsea College of Art and the National Design Academy. Mariela has extensive professional experience of human-centred spatial design.

Content designer interview questions – plus what to ask your interviewers

Read Time:8 Minute, 24 Second

Here are some interview topics and questions you might encounter, plus what you could ask the interviewers, a simple CV structure and pointers for stepping into content design.

For each topic I flag what to consider and provide links to relevant modules from the Cake Design Studio content design and UCD e-learning. These could be a helpful springboard – but remember interviewers are looking for real world context. Demonstrating how you overcame challenges and how you showed pragmatism in coping with, for example, budget and scope constraints will generally go down well.

Comments are open on this post – please add any more interview questions, topics and considerations that might be helpful for the community.


Interview topics and questions

1. User needs

What is meant by a ‘user need’? How would you describe a ‘user need’?
How do you discover user needs?
How do user needs relate to content design? How do user needs relate to page structure and information architecture?
How would a content designer check that their content meets user needs?

Consider:

Needs versus wants, user stories, job stories, acceptance criteria, user research, language research, analytics, content hierarchy, page sketching, task-based content, topic grouping.

Prepare:

User needs: meaning and design purpose module 🍰

2. Content accessibility and usability

What are 3 essentials for accessible content? What factors come into content accessibility?
In what ways can a content designer make web and digital content more usable?
Can you tell us about a website or app you’ve come across recently which was not usable? How could you improve this with content design?
Do you have any examples of how you have improved content accessibility in a past role?
How would you make the case for content accessibility and usability?

Consider:

Text alternatives, clear language, readability, legibility, literacy, button size, font, tech, non-flashing images, user research, situational, temporary and permanent disability, WCAG 2.1, Equality Act, accessibility is usability, social model of disability, stats, reaching the widest audience and customer base.

Prepare:

Content accessibility an introduction – FREE module 🍰
Content usability basics module 🍰

3. Language research

How do you make decisions on which words to use in your content?
What language research methods do you use?
What would you say are the differences between optimising content for (your own) users and optimising content for search-engines? Humans use search engines, so why shouldn’t an SEO-focused approach be the default?

Consider:

Clear language, readability, user research, literacy, audience and customer base, location, context, jargon, user needs and motivations, Google Trends, Answer the public, Google Search Console, SEM Rush, keywords, metadata, user interviews, user feedback, help desk data.

Prepare:

Content findability module 🍰

4. Content inclusivity

How do you approach designing inclusive content?
What are some important considerations for inclusive design?

Consider:

Diverse team, diverse user research participants, representation (of broad range of genders, races, cultures, nationalities, ages, abilities, sexualities, class backgrounds, financial situations, relationship statuses, family set ups, more).

Prepare:

Content inclusivity: an introduction module 🍰
Design out bias module 🍰

5. Scaling quality content

How would you approach introducing content quality standards across a large site?
What processes and methods can support content quality?
How would you make it easier for remote, devolved editing teams to adopt content quality standards?

Consider:

Strategy, governance, tech, team size, central support team, standards, style guidance, content patterns, structured content, user-needs bank, task-based content, consistency, processes, gatekeeping, publication flow, approval flow, localised content, personalisation, customisation, content management systems, training, maintenance, community of practice, content workshops, internal content conferences with remote access.

Prepare

What is readability? module 🍰
Task-based content module 🍰

6. Governance and content strategy

What should an organisation’s content strategy cover?
What publication models have organisations you’ve worked at used (centralised, devolved, hub and spoke) and what are some advantages and disadvantages of each?
Have you had any experience developing content standards?
How have you gone about engaging content owners in the past?

Consider

Content creation, content ownership, maintenance, consistency, accessibility, asset library, style guidance, content review, factual sign off, content management system, publication flow, responsibility, standards, show and tell, stats, analytics, presentation.

Prepare

Content usability basics module 🍰

7. Working with stakeholders

How do you engage stakeholders and subject experts in the content design process?
What approaches do you take when a subject expert is unhappy about their content being changed?

Consider

Show and tells, pair writing, presentations, best practice, competitor/sector examples, readability, clear language, how people read online, task-based content, user needs.

Prepare

Pair writing a content item 🍰
Content usability basics module 🍰
User needs: meaning, and design purpose module 🍰

8. Advocating for content design and UCD

How would you explain content design to someone who had not heard of it before? Same question for user-centred design.
What are 3 things you would like someone new to content design to remember about it?
What activities have you been involved in previously where the aim was to engage other teams with content design processes?
Have you ever needed to convince a budget holder to invest in user research? How did you go about it?

Consider

Show and tells, blog post shared in all-staff email or featured as internal news item, championing content design to directors as well as subject experts and service teams, community of practice, demonstrating uplift, before and after examples, value, ROI, explaining what content design is, user needs, usability, accessibility, stats, best practice examples, presentations, guidance, sharing training, recommending books.

Prepare

Content accessibility an introduction – FREE module 🍰
Content usability basics module 🍰
Design out bias module 🍰
User needs: meaning, and design purpose module 🍰

9. Return on investment, success indicators

How have you shown the value of content in a previous role?
What measurements and indicators have you used to show uplift in user satisfaction with content?

Consider

Fewer complaints, help desk less busy, positive feedback, surveys, user needs acceptance criteria fulfilled, user interviews, representation, accessibility review, analytics show page visits to previously unfound content, more conversions, completed transactions, quicker user journeys.

Prepare

Content findability module 🍰
Design centred on users: an introduction 🍰

10. Collaborating with other disciplines

What are your experiences of working in a multidisciplinary team?
How do you communicate with user researchers, visual designers and developers on a project?

What is the most useful thing you have learnt from another discipline and how do you apply it to content design?
How have you collaborated with service teams, project owners, subject experts and other stakeholders?

Consider

Daily stand ups, video calls, team meetings, talking to them, retros, show and tells, user research analysis sessions, asking questions, understanding the offline service experience, presentations, lunch and learn, question and answer sessions.

Prepare

Why multi-disciplinary teamwork works 🍰
Pair writing a content item 🍰
Content inclusivity: an introduction 🍰


“Have you got any questions for us?”

What is the digital content team size?
How long have you been practising user-centred design at [organisation name]?

How on board with content design processes are the content owners or subject experts?
Do you have content owners who approve content changes, or subject experts with factual sign off?
How often do you do user research interviews or usability testing?
Do you design iteratively? What is the content maintenance cycle like?
What opportunities would there be for me to progress in a content design role at [organisation name]?

Do you hold daily stand ups and regular retros?

References for the UCD maturity of an organisation include:

You will have very different opportunities and challenges as a content designer at different stages of UCD maturity of an organisation.


Your CV structure

Here is a simple outline that you can adapt. You do not need to include your gender, age, marital status or address on your CV.

Profile (1 or 2 lines)
Skills
Software and tools
Professional training
Qualifications
Publications
(blog posts, articles, papers, books)
Awards


Work history (could be more than 1 page)

Languages (if relevant to role position this section at top, for example after or within Skills)
Interests

Presenting your work history

If you are you continuing in the same career direction and building on previous roles, you can present this chronologically as:

  • recent: brief narrative
  • mid: bullet points
  • older: only title and dates

But if you are changing direction, put focus on transferrable skills and relevant experiences by presenting your experience by relevancy, which could be non-chronological, so:

  • relevant: brief narrative
  • less relevant: bullet points
  • not very relevant: only title and dates

Stepping into content design and user-centred design

If you have not worked specifically in content design before, there are many transferrable skills you might have. 14 of us offer career tips in this Working in Content article, including examples of how to best frame your existing experience.

The UK civil service is a very good way to increase your experience in user-centred design. It offers design training, and occasionally has junior role openings available.

Some digital agencies offer salaried academies where you can learn as you earn and graduate into client work. These come with the opportunity to meet highly skilled , UCD-experienced staff, work on great projects.

Lauren Pope, content strategist, and Adam Silver, interaction designer, have excellent newsletters and there are many great #ContentDesign, #ServiceDesign, #UserResearch and other #UCD folk to follow on LinkedIn and Bluesky.


Career path

You may also like to explore the content designer career path and official skillsets from the UK Government Digital Service, the organisation where the discipline originated.

Content design career progression can be from associate to head of, but you may end up stepping into another user-centred design discipline, or may come from one.

Working in content design and strategy, you may frequently need to advocate for content design and user-centred design. You’re welcome to re-use my 6 essential things for businesses to know about content design presentation just reference to Cake Design Studio as your source.

Good luck!


Image credit: Photo by RODNAE Productions on Pexels.com.

Cake Bitesize lessons: curated building blocks in user-centred design

Read Time:10 Minute, 54 Second
sliced of strawberry cake
Grab a cuppa, this is a longish read to explain the why, what and who behind our simple e-learning products.

Quietly, in the background, over the last months I’ve been creating short, beginners’ lessons in user-centred design. These are online, fit together modularly, and can be studied at the learner’s own pace. 5 of them are ready, which seems enough for a proof of concept. Update 29 September, 2021 – 15 are ready, with 10 available combined into a content design pathway.

My lessons are written in clear language. They explain approaches, techniques, principles and processes, and translate terminology. They focus on 1 topic at a time. Most lessons are 8 units and a test, taking on average 20 to 30 minutes to absorb and complete. The idea is they can be fitted into a spare half hour – a cancelled meeting, a lunch break, a bus journey. Oh, and they are highly affordable, at tiny prices like £4 each.

Why? In short, because people asked me to, plus I wanted to make high quality, reliable user-centred design learning affordable, easy to access and available in clear language.

“Can you give the team a quick summary?”

Knowledge around user-centred design is readily available online already. But there are some problems with it. Too much, too long, too expensive, too “Gov”.

Googling is overwhelming

Self-teach internet searches can be hazardous. How reliable is the source, is it so jargon-stuffed a learner can’t comprehend anything, where can you find just the basics? Google overwhelm is real. And user-centred design professionals are often as unaware of their depth of knowledge – and the learning barrier of our discipline’s own specialist terms – as they are passionate about their subject.

Too long, didn’t read

So I would send clients a curated list of links, including the excellent Readability Guidelines. I would recommend paid and free courses, like the essential, 16 hours over 4 weeks GDS FutureLearn Introduction to Content Design. I’d tell them about meet ups and talks.

But this was not the user need, or perhaps the user want in some cases. They wanted a 20 minute PowerPoint presentation, or a specific area explained, like pair writing, content patterns, information architecture or multi-disciplinary teams on a quick, Zoom chat. Or a manager would say their staff needed to learn how to do content design, and could I please run them through it in a 1 hour session? And can you give everyone else an overview in a 5 minute presentation at the end of the weekly Design team meeting?

What you don’t know you don’t know, you don’t know you need to know

How do you explain to someone who thinks information architecture skills can be taught through a short presentation that you should start with user needs? How do you illuminate an eager team, without discouraging them, on the fact that content design is vast and intricate, and learning about it will require quite a lot more than 1 hour of their time?

The problem was, the people want-it-yesterday level curious about content design and user-centred design, tended not to be in content or design roles themselves, and didn’t have any comprehension of how much goes into design work. They just wanted a quick download of 10 key points. Sometimes on the spot, as the concepts of needing to think and plan, never mind research unique needs, scope and sculpt, were alien to them: a live demo of the very workplace culture issues that Agile, user-centred design sets out to rectify.

Supporting staff to learn flexibly, in a way that suits them

User-centred design, its techniques, principles and processes, and terminology is a whole new world for beginners, with language of its own.

But as the large majority of organisations don’t have formal, user-centred design training for everyone built in, non-design professionals who are curious or need to learn about user-centred design understandably generally want, and need, something that can be fitted into spare time in their schedule, for example:

  • cancelled meeting
  • lunch break
  • early start
  • end of day before meeting someone for dinner
  • on parental leave while the baby is napping

My answer: a matrix of modules

So for my last charity client, a major national organisation with at the time only 1 content designer, I started compiling short, modular, informational Google docs, a process that catalysed me to go on to create my bitesize lessons, just as previous experience leading a team of editors on a commercial website redesign project inspired my writing for web tip cards.

Somewhat ironically, to avoid plagiarism I ended up having to re-express myself, again clearly, on clear language (I wrote of all the Content Design London Readability Guidelines, based on collaboratively sourced usability evidence).

These Google docs were interlinked, so that people could learn about the topic they were aware they needed to understand more on, for example writing for web, and through onward links uncover other areas, like language research for SEO, usability and inclusivity. They were destined for the client’s intranet or MS Teams site, where they would be served up under their own branding.

Further propellants

While this sub-heading has a slight whiff of the miscellaneous folder, these are the other, important reasons behind my drive to create these lessons.

Little or no user-centred design culture

Often content designers find themselves fresh in a new job or contract, ready to use their skills and “do content design” but find no-one knows what it involves – crucially no-one understands the infrastructure needed, like budget, and stakeholder time for: user research, pair writing, content crits, show and tells, retros and more.

It’s well known among design professionals that user-centred design is a team sport. But so few organisations know how to play it.

And it’s well documented that when CEOs, stakeholders, subject experts and managers understand and advocate for user-centred design and Agile, it’s much easier for user-centred designers to do their jobs, ideally working in multi-disciplinary teams with user and stakeholder involvement through the design process.

Unfortunately, the majority of organisation

These lessons aim to support people in all different roles at an organisations to learn about user-centred design, in a very non-intimidating, user-friendly way.

That’s for Gov

Unfortunately the GDS user-centred design resources, their FutureLearn content design course and the GOV.UK A to Z of style are too often seen as “too government-y” and sadly, and fairly irritatingly, felt not relevant or appropriate by many commercial, charity or higher ed clients. Despite my highly recommending them, with strong reference to their proven usability-based approach to style.

Explaining that Government Digital Service outputs are a publicly funded digital resource for everyone to make use of made no difference either. And it’s not just me, other content strategists have reported the same experience.

Do you do training on X?

At the same time, I had a steady trickle of LinkedIn messages, emails and Twitter DMs asking if I could give a training session on different, very specific areas of content design or user-centred design.

About the Cake Bitesize lessons

So, all this led me to think, what if I create some lessons in the basics, that are short enough and affordable enough not to put anyone off? In clear language and focused on 1 topic at at a time. Essentially, I reviewed all the blockers to learning about user-centred design and attempted to clear them.

Modular

Each to-the-point, concisely written lesson stands on its own, but is also part of a series. They are curated, clear language building blocks, enabling learners to upskill, refresh or fill in any gaps in their user-centred design knowledge.

For example, you might start with an introduction to user-centred design, and go on to the introduction to content design. Or you may buy and bookmark the glossary of user-centred design terms (by the way, it’s only £1). Or you might go straight to a lesson on user journey mapping or content findability.

When more lessons are live I will publish suggested routes through the topics depending on area of interest, and will look to make them available as bundles or a complete collection – someone has already expressed an interest in buying them all at once.

Affordable

It is very important to me to make these lessons as affordable as possible. We don’t all have the privilege of disposable income, and even though professional development is an investment, it’s one that not everyone can afford. Not everyone will have an employer paying for their training either: many of us are freelance, self-employed, on zero hour contracts, or unemployed.

The other major reason for the low prices are to encourage people to try them out. And if they like it, to try out some more! I was thinking in terms of literally snackable content: learn in your lunch hour, for the price of a meal deal.

While the prices are tiny – the first 5 are at £0, £1 and £4 – the quality is high.

Format

Usually, lessons have 6 to 8 units plus a short end of lesson comprehension test. Glossaries of terms, and techniques and processes lessons, have different numbers of units. Learners work through at their own pace, which of course differs for everyone but I estimate an average of 20 to 30 minutes is needed for each lesson.

Lessons focus on 1 topic at a time, starting with an overview and drilling down into further need-to-know detail.

The lesson content is text-based, with examples. Occasionally informational images are included, when this happens the meaning is explained in the main lesson text. So far there has not been a need for video but this may change! If so it will be captioned and a transcript provided.

DuoLingo is a big inspiration for the lesson series, and the lessons, created with WordPress Courses software, are easy to access and use on mobile, as well as desktop and tablet.

Audience

A broad audience of potential learners is catered for, in an effort to increase broader understanding of user-centred design within organisations.

  • career changers and progressors
  • students
  • design roles without specialist content design and readability knowledge
  • non-design roles
  • team leaders, managers, delivery managers, product owners
  • stakeholders, CEOs and other budgeting decision makers
  • anyone curious about user-centred design or content design

About the creator

Teaching background

I’m no stranger to creating lessons, courses and educational resources. As well as giving content design and writing for web training through Cake Consultancy to government, charity and commercial clients, I’ve helped Content Design London develop accessible content training, written the Readability Guidelines, written a practical how-to book on user-centred design for intranets, sold many sets of writing for web tip cards, have a post-grad teaching qualification and taught English abroad.

User-centred design career

My 17 years in user-centred design started at a digitally advanced local council in 2003. From the very beginning of my career, I was training subject experts in writing for web.

Since then, among others, I’ve worked for GDS, 8 government departments, Content Design London, John Lewis, Great Western Railway, Post Office, Cambridge University, RNIB and Scope.

Clear language expertise

My experience as a content designer and strategist – explaining and presenting dense information and complex concepts in concise, clear content – equips me to create very user-friendly beginner, refresher and improver lesson content.

Lessons available now

The full list of planned lessons is slowly but surely getting populated with hyperlinks for lessons that are ready. With a number now live, it feels a good time to test out their usefulness and popularity as a proof of content.

So far, 5 lessons are available, including a free one:

Introduction to user-centred design £4
User needs: meaning, and design purpose £4
Defining shared project vocabulary £4
Glossary of user-centred design terms £1
20+ user research techniques FREE

Please try them out, and if you think they have value do share them. You can keep up to date with Cake Bitesize lessons on Twitter at @CakeBitesize, and I regularly post about them from @CakeContent too.

If you find the lessons useful, I’d be really grateful for a review, tweet or LinkedIn post about them. Endorsements from learners are extremely helpful.

Support the user-centred design bitesize lessons cause with a coffee, to go with all the cake! ☕

I imagine that many of you will not need these lessons yourself, but you may well see how your work culture could benefit from other roles using these lessons. If that’s you, please consider supporting me with a coffee to keep things going.

And if you know of any tech for good grants I could apply to for continuing to create these affordable, inclusive, easily-accessible lessons, do please let me know!

Further reference links from ‘Task-based intranet content’

Read Time:5 Minute, 11 Second

My book ‘Task-based intranet content: a step by step guide to user-centred design’ gives multiple external references for your onward research. Since they can’t be linked to from a print copy, to make it easier for you than Googling them all, here’s a list of links chapter by chapter. Thanks to Lisa Riemers for the suggestion!

Chapter 1. Planning 

1.2 Timeline

Main stages of the project development

1.3 Case studies

GovIntranet demo site

Intranet Diary

Barnardo’s

Chartered Institute of Public Relations (CIPR)

Citizens Advice

Co-op

Devon County Council

Nielsen Norman Group yearly intranet design report

1.4 Reading and resources

Design, strategy and research books

Content design articles by Lizzie Bruce

Content guidelines

Specifically on intranets

Code

GovIntranet WordPress theme
GDS design system

Chapter 2. Communications 

None

Chapter 3. Design 

3.2 Putting it into practice

3.3 Definitions of user-centred design

Interaction Design Foundation

United States government

World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) Web Accessibility Initiative

Chapter 4. Users 

4.1 Types of users, their contexts and environments

Your users

4.4 Problems give you user needs

Journey mapping

Chapter 5. Information flow 

5.3 Updating your database

Adding categories

5.4 Universal intranet topics

Topic tags

Chapter 6. What’s live?

6.2 Audit for user needs

Chapter 7. Scheduling

7.3 Pair-writing with stakeholders

7.5 Logistics

Training

Chapter 8. Creating content

8.2 Images

8.4 Content patterns

8.5 Writing task and guide content

Tasks

Guides

8.7 User test the content

Chapter 9. What’s missing? 

9.1 News and directory

9.6 Online learning

Chapter 10. Navigation

10.1 Example navigation

User testing

Chapter 11. Launch 

None

Chapter 12. After live 

12.4 Content calendar

Populate the calendar


About the book

“This will become the go-to resource for intranet projects” — Robert Mills

Create content that makes it faster for people to find what they need on the intranet than from a colleague. Learn user-centred design as you progress through this practical, stage by stage guide. Generally, people want information about a specific thing, fast, when they visit an intranet. They need it in as little time as possible, so they can get to a meeting, or enjoy their lunch break.

This book outlines processes that put into practice these 3 essential principles for user-centred intranet content:

1. Content reflects a staff need for it.
2. Information is easy to find.
3. Style, tone and language is optimised for users with little time to read and absorb content.

Lizzie Bruce pours her experience of designing intranet content around staff needs for UK government into 100 pages of advice and techniques for creating usable, readable content.

Includes:

  • list of universal intranet tasks
  • glossary of user-centred design terms
  • project “shopping list”
  • timeline planner
  • tips for stakeholder buy-in
  • links to case studies and blogs

Every organisation planning an intranet redesign needs this book.

‘Task-based intranet content’ book: now published

Read Time:3 Minute, 1 Second

My practical, step by step guide to user-centred intranets is now published. It’s the only book out there on creating task-based intranet content, and is written by a DCMS award-winning intranet content lead and GovIntranet content creator.

“Really good stuff from someone who knows her intranets.” – Tom Loosemore, digital transformation consultant at Public Digital, ex-GDS, ex-BBC.

“This will become the go-to resource for intranet projects” – Robert Mills, independent content and communications consultant.

Buy the book

You can buy my book in print or as an eBook. The print version has additional shipping costs.

About the book

“Create content that makes it faster for people to find what they need on the intranet than from a colleague. Learn user-centred design as you progress through this practical, stage by stage guide. Generally, people want information about a specific thing, fast, when they visit an intranet. They need it in as little time as possible, so they can get to a meeting, or enjoy their lunch break.

This book outlines processes that put into practice these 3 essential principles for user-centred intranet content:

1. Content reflects a staff need for it.
2. Information is easy to find.
3. Style, tone and language is optimised for users with little time to read and absorb content.

Lizzie Bruce pours her experience of designing intranet content around staff needs for UK government into 100 pages of advice and techniques for creating usable, readable content.

Includes:

  • list of universal intranet tasks
  • glossary of user-centred design terms
  • project “shopping list”
  • timeline planner
  • tips for stakeholder buy-in
  • links to case studies and blogs

Every organisation planning an intranet redesign needs this book.”

About the author

Lizzie Bruce is a content strategist and user-centred design training creator. Firmly committed to user-centred, accessible and inclusive design, since 2003 she’s applied her skills in multiple sectors: public to property, legal to leisure, art to eco, finance to fashion. Clients have included UK central and local government, RNIB, Great Western Railway, John Lewis and University of Cambridge.

Lizzie led Content Design London’s award-winning Readability Guidelines project, writing the guidelines, wiki and handbook content, and is a regular contributor to content publications. She’s spoken on content at conferences and meet-ups in Brighton, Budapest, Canberra, London, Melbourne, Sydney and Tokyo.

Thank you

Thanks very much for your interest in this book, and thank you in advance for buying it if you do. It’s for anyone involved in an intranet redesign project, particularly those new to user-centred design practices, but should also be useful to people who haven’t previously worked on a task-based intranet.

Thanks again for everyone’s encouragement during my writing of this new book.

It’s dedicated to all the user-centred design advocates, content strategists and clear language experts whose work in the field have paved its way.

For all the user-centred design advocates, content strategist and clear language experts who have gone before me, and made my path smoother.

External further references are marked in the second edition of the print book (amber cover) with a square bullet. Direct links are listed on this website: access list of further reference links.

Where to buy

You can buy in print or as an eBook:

I may create an audio version or put the book up on more platforms, and will update here if that happens. It won’t coming out on Amazon, due ethical concerns about their working practices.

Early access to ‘User-centred design for intranets’ webbook by Ko-fi.com donation

Read Time:1 Minute, 36 Second

We’ve opened early access to ‘User-centred design for intranets: a practical guide for task-based content’ as a Pressbooks webbook.

You can get the all-chapter access passcode by making a ko-fi.com donation of £6, the price of a London coffee and croissant. This is to make the book content and advice available as soon as possible for whoever needs and wants it quickly. Scroll to find out how.

Ebook and print formats to follow soon

The eBook and print on demand formats will follow later in the year. We are still collecting feedback from selected early readers, so the content may change slightly in the final print set, published version.

How to get early access

Include your Twitter handle on your Ko-fi donation message, or after your donation send us a direct message on Twitter @cakecontent, as we’ll need to send you the webbook all-chapter access passcode privately. We aim to do this within 24 hours of your donation, and will check for new orders at around 6pm each day.

We’ll try to make it possible for everyone who donates on Ko-fi.com for the webbook preview to get a discount code for the eBook but can’t guarantee that will happen. So, if you don’t need it straightaway and want to hang on for the eBook please do, it should be out by the end of November.

View the chapter outline on the Pressbooks website.

Micro-reviews welcomed!

Feel free to tweet your reactions about our intranet content book if you take up the early access webbook offer. Please tag us, we’re @cakecontent.

Or if you fancy writing a longer review on your blog or Medium we would of course be very grateful, they will help spread word of this user-centred design intranet content resource more widely.